THORChain: Math Doesn’t Take Requests
Chad Barraford is a co-founder and the technical lead of THORChain, the cross-chain decentralized exchange that lets users swap native assets — real Bitcoin for real Ethereum — without wrapping, bridging or trusting an intermediary. He found crypto in 2017 while traveling, having sold everything he owned, and built a blockchain from scratch as an academic exercise on the theory that the best way to understand a thing is to construct it from zero. He met his co-founder at a Cosmos hackathon in Berlin in 2019; the first lines of THORChain were written there, and the token launched a week later.
The link will open a new window. Click the menu and down arrow to download the file.
Podcasts available on
Why you should listen
THORChain spent late September in the middle of crypto’s loudest argument. After attackers took roughly $387.5 million from Bitget on 24 September, portions of the proceeds were routed through THORChain into Bitcoin, and Bitget CEO Gracy Chen made a public, formal request that the protocol refuse service to the attacker addresses. The answer was no — though Chad’s first move in this conversation is to reject the premise of the question. It was not his answer, because he does not own, operate or control THORChain. There is no mechanism in the code base to block a wallet or a transaction, and never has been. Even if the community wanted one, validator consensus takes between three days and two weeks to reach a two-thirds majority, by which point a swap observed an hour ago is long settled. To make blocking practical you would have to install an admin key and redesign the protocol around centralization — at which point, as he puts it, you have rebuilt traditional finance on a different technology stack and he is no longer interested in the problem.
The obvious counter is that THORChain’s own node operators did pause the network in May, when a flaw in its threshold signature scheme let an attacker drain $10.7 million from one of six vaults and the protocol went dark for 39 days. Chad’s distinction is between protecting the protocol and policing its users: validators on any chain have a security obligation to the network they are paid to secure, which is why Bitcoin’s own miners forked away the value overflow bug in August 2010 after someone minted 184 billion coins out of nothing. A halt is not a selective freeze. What genuinely puzzles him is the singling out — six or more DEXs handled Bitget-linked flows, Uniswap among the venues in the broader conversation, and nobody asks Bitcoin or Ethereum to reject tainted transactions. On where responsibility actually sits, he is blunt: stolen funds have to exit to dollars eventually, and that exit runs through centralized exchanges, which are the entities that can stop it and have not always chosen to.
Supporting links
- Stabull Finance
- THORChain
- THORChain on X
- Chad Barraford on X
- Andy on X
- Brave New Coin on X
- Brave New Coin
If you enjoyed the show please subscribe to The Crypto Conversation and give us a 5-star rating and a positive review.
Disclaimer: Any educational content, market commentary, research, analysis, forecasts, coaching, training, or opinions provided by independent third parties do not represent the views of Plus500. Plus500 provides self-trading execution-only services and does not provide asset management nor investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Plus500 accepts no responsibility or liability for any decisions made or losses incurred as a result of reliance on information, research, educational materials, coaching, or services provided by third parties.
Brave New Coin reaches 1M+ engaged crypto enthusiasts a month through our website, podcast, newsletters, and YouTube. Get your brand in front of key decision-makers and early adopters in 2026. Limited slots remaining! Find out more today!
Beldex – The Case For A Full Privacy Stack
